Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has this ever happened before? DM well under control? Does she take insulin? Did she possibly take to much? Great she ate lunch today, but we have no idea what time it is currently, is it midnight or is it 1600? Has she been vomiting or sick at all recently?History of heart trouble, diabetic, takes medication for both. Fire has began CPR in accordance with AED. Fire states PT was found in home AC on last oral intake was lunch according to husband
Wait a second. Pulse of 140 and CPR advised? Did I miss something? Why is fire doing CPR on a patient with a pulse? Kick em out for starters. Pretty much what everyone else is saying. D10 and reassess. The patient has a HX of diabetes then its a no brainer. Sugar, reassess, and get the AMA form ready.
Has this ever happened before? DM well under control? Does she take insulin? Did she possibly take to much? Great she ate lunch today, but we have no idea what time it is currently, is it midnight or is it 1600? Has she been vomiting or sick at all recently?
What kind of "heart problems"? What are the medications she is on? When was the patient last seen normal?
Let's say we kicked fire out and started our own assessment, what are her vitals, AO status, and BGL?
What are her actual vitals? Turn the pump off or disconnect it.
What are her actual vitals? Turn the pump off or disconnect it.
side question can CPR done and not needed cause any real harm other then the broken ribs?
Fire has began CPR in accordance with AED.
This is a theoretical scenario right? Not one that really happened? Please tell me this didn't actually happen.
This is a theoretical scenario right? Not one that really happened? Please tell me this didn't actually happen.
Fire arrived checked vitals learned of the history of Heart problems and for whatever reason attached the AED. The AED said no shocked advised start CPR, Fire did as the AED said.
AED's have failsafes to prevent this from happening.
An AED cannot tell the difference in VT and pulseless VT. It assumes pulseless because it was applied and turned on. An AED is only supposed to recommend a shock for VF and VT situations. If it sees anything else, it's supposed to basically say "no shock advised" and "check pulse" and otherwise do nothing. So if you apply it to a patient that's got a HR in the 180's but has a narrow QRS (think SVT not VT), the AED will not advise a shock. People are the first fail-safe. You only apply the AED to someone that's pulseless. After that, the programming knows to look only for VF or VT.How so? Think there was a topic on this a while back, but can an AED tell the difference between vtach and pulseless vtach?
Not at all saying fire wasn't in the wrong, interested in the failsafe comment.