Health-insurance for everyone in USA

Obama's plan for a new health-insurance, i think;

  • Everybody must take care of themselves, nothing must be changed

    Votes: 7 26.9%
  • It's good to have everyone insured, also the people who can't afford it

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • I don't know yet

    Votes: 5 19.2%

  • Total voters
    26

Dutch-EMT

BScN
97
1
8
Following the plans of Obama on the news, I was a little bit shocked about the selfish opinion told by a few residents from a small town in the middle of the USA (Canton).
A Dutch tv-programma makes a report out of this town to follow the economic crisis and the changes with Obama as president.

A woman has to sell her house because she wasn't insured and had a heart-attack. The hospital bills she has to pay are about $50.000
With her husband unemployed they are bankrupted.
In the next report the tv-crew asked a woman on the street about the health insurance for everyone, as Obama wants to introduce.
The case of the first woman was explaned and her reaction was:"When they don't wanna pay for an insurance, then it's their own problem...
She didn't even think about the fact, that some people can't afford an insurance. I was realy surprised by this woman.

In the Netherlands we already have a health-insurance wich is for everyone the same and also an obligation. The people who don't earn enough get an addition from the government. This is an basic insurance. Hospital and ambulance-care, physician care, medicins are all included.
For dental care, maternity nursing, physiotherapy and other paramedic consults we can choose if we want to pay for it.
The health-insurance (basic) costs about €100,= ($145,=) a month.
With extra dental care it's about €110,= ($160,=)
The Dutch people think Obama has great plans!

How do paramedics and EMT's think about the plans of Obama?
You must see a lot of people without insurance who refuse to go to the hospital?
 

Shishkabob

Forum Chief
8,264
32
48
Hey, I'm all for everyone having insurance, but it is NOT the federal govts job to pay for it.

People should NOT be forced to have insurance and should NOT be fined for opting to not have it.

Employers should NOT be forced to provide it, and NOT be fined for not providing it.


Imagine the good that would happen if the $1trillion for the healthcare was instead put in to our education system.


I'm all for insurance reforms and reigning in the companies and making it more fair
 
OP
OP
Dutch-EMT

Dutch-EMT

BScN
97
1
8
People should NOT be forced to have insurance and should NOT be fined for opting to not have it.

Well, in the Netherlands it works perfect! Everybody pays tax. But the heightof the tax depends on the income. The addition depends also on the income. Everybody has insurance. And nobody feels less free. It doesn't feel like it is forced. When somebody doesn't have insurance, the tax-authorities will be on you in max. 6 months. Those people get an addition for insurance and use it for other things. They will be forced to take a health-insurance.

In the USA are 50.000.000 people without insurance. Only one sickness bring people (who mostly don't have a lot to spend or are unemployed) to bankruptcy. When I should be in a position of unemployement and I couldn't insure my family because i'm broke... It should be terrible.
 

akflightmedic

Forum Deputy Chief
3,893
2,568
113
Hey, I'm all for everyone having insurance, but it is NOT the federal govts job to pay for it.

People should NOT be forced to have insurance and should NOT be fined for opting to not have it.

Employers should NOT be forced to provide it, and NOT be fined for not providing it.


Imagine the good that would happen if the $1trillion for the healthcare was instead put in to our education system.


I'm all for insurance reforms and reigning in the companies and making it more fair

So should we not be forced to have car insurance and not be fined when we don't?

You are ok with someone totaling your car, possibly injuring you and not having insurance?

I mean after all, it is a forced insurance, no?

Or is it just medical you care about...or don't care? Doctor's should not be forced to carry mal practice insurance. Home insurance, forget about it...why do we force it?

Just asking...
 

Sasha

Forum Chief
7,667
11
0
Hey, I'm all for everyone having insurance, but it is NOT the federal govts job to pay for it.

People should NOT be forced to have insurance and should NOT be fined for opting to not have it.

Employers should NOT be forced to provide it, and NOT be fined for not providing it.


Imagine the good that would happen if the $1trillion for the healthcare was instead put in to our education system.


I'm all for insurance reforms and reigning in the companies and making it more fair

Aren't you the one who was toting that people should get employed by employers that offer insurance if they could not afford it for themselves?

Sooo.. what if they have a pre-exsisting condition that makes their premiums per month unaffordable? Since employers don't have to offer it she should just languish and die? I think I've said this before, but my obese, diabetic, hep c mother would have to pay more than $500 a month in insurance, plus any copay, if she had insurance. That is more than half her rent. If she didn't work for an employer who offered insurance she'd probably still be uninsured, unmedicated, and very sick. What are people like her supposed to do, since you don't approve of universal health care, but don't think employers should offer insurance, which was your master plan for insuring the masses?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

46Young

Level 25 EMS Wizard
3,063
90
48
Many that have private insurance, good private insurance, feel like they're already paying enough, and are doing what they're supposed to by having a job that features that plan. Money is tight in many working households. It's necessary for the breadwinner to do OT or side work, or have the spouse go to work, at the expense of time with the children among other things. Now the gov't is potentially asking these households to surrender more of their disposable income to the uninsured.

If you've become unemployed legitimately, not just on paper (I mean working off the books while receiving public assisance, thus misrepresetnting your true income, and failing to contribute taxes as such), become recently divorced or widowed with no income streams, suffered a disabling accident, or for other LEGITIMATE reasons, I'm all for providing health coverage for those populations.

It's those individuals that game the system, who take whatever handouts that they can get, and basically get a free ride from the gov't, that I have a problem with carrying financially. I'm referring to those individuals who never intend to work, ever, since their needs are taken care of for free. Welfare, Section 8 housing and other programs of the like were originally intended to help individuals/families provide for basic necessities while they WORK towards financial independence. If you're looking for a revenue stream to help pay for universal healthcare, then the gov't ought to require these individuals to find legal work within a certain time frame, or at least devote a certain amount of time each week to community volunteer activities, so they benefit society in some fashion. Look there first before asking me to surrender more of my disposable income.

I'm working OT and a side job, at the expense of family time, to be able to buy a home, invest for my childrens' education, and for retirement. Asking me to surrender that income to individuals who refuse to work (not unable to, but refuse to, there's a difference) and those in this country illegally (as opposed to our ancestors that went about it the proper, legal route), is fundamentally wrong. We're working, saving, investing, and doing without certain things while someone down the block receives free food, medical, cheap housing and such while refusing to work, or worse - working off the books, making good money, while they get most of their basic needs free of charge from the gov't. I've personally witnessed this many times over. This is where much of the opposition and outrage towards universal healthcare coverage likely originates.

My current coverage is better than average. I pay about $350 pre tax monthly, and everything is covered 100%, (PPO), my MD copay is $10, ED $50 unless admitted, then free, scripts are $10 generic, and $35 otherwise. All prenatal care is 100% covered after initial visit. Vision is included. I'm waiting to see two things - first, how will my coverage change? Everything is basically covered 100%. Will that remain intact? Second, how will the cost of that coverage change? Will my premium increase by making it post tax, an increase in the Federal tax rate, deductibles (which I'm not currently required to pay) or via some other discreet method of taxation (or "fees" or whatever)?

So, we may be asked to surrender much more of our (maybe) disposable income, and possibly not enjoy the same level/accessability of care. Given that in addition to the above reasons, why would I be in favor of universal healthcare?

Also, no one really knows what universal healthcare will entail. There's absolutely no way our Reps and Senators could possibly read the entire bill in the time frame alloted before the vote. It's impossible. So, congress is again voting on bills that they could have not possibly have reviewed adequately.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

firecoins

IFT Puppet
3,880
18
38
I do not believe in a single payer system. I think that that a single payer government run service will decide what medical care you receive and will not receive simply because resources are limited. I am against that.

There are ways to make insurance cheaper for people in the USA without a massive spending and taxes. I support government programs for people who need assistance just not a single payer system. The public option is going to eventually become the single payer system.

I do not believe in forcing people to have insurance as is the current plan. People are not forced to have cars. I didn't have health insurance by choice for 3 years. I was healthy and didn't want to spend the money. I see no reason why this freedom should be lost.
 

bunkie

Forum Asst. Chief
620
0
0
OP, in your country everyone pays the same percentage of tax right?

That's the problem in the US. We do not have set universal tax. So we can not maintain the kinds of programs that much smaller countries in Europe provide their citizens. That said, I firmly believe our entire tax/health care/public assistance systems need to be overhauled. But each of those problems will take decades to tackle.
 

46Young

Level 25 EMS Wizard
3,063
90
48
Also, think about all of the small businesses that wil go bankrupt if they are required to provide health coverage. Profit margins are razor thin as it is for many of these businesses. That would put them over the edge.
 

medicdan

Forum Deputy Chief
Premium Member
2,494
19
38
This topic is the center of my major course of study in college. I have many, many complicated opinions. What I think we need to do, before enacting any significant change, is to closely examine the resources we put into healthcare. We need to learn how to cut costs on "high technology", resource utilization, etc.

Look at what "universal healthcare" has done for Massachusetts....
 

Seaglass

Lesser Ambulance Ape
973
0
0
This topic is the center of my major course of study in college. I have many, many complicated opinions. What I think we need to do, before enacting any significant change, is to closely examine the resources we put into healthcare. We need to learn how to cut costs on "high technology", resource utilization, etc.

I agree. I think we need tort reform and some redirection of the budget (how about taking subsidies away from corn and putting them towards pharmaceutical research, for instance?) before we try for universal healthcare.
 

46Young

Level 25 EMS Wizard
3,063
90
48
I agree. I think we need tort reform and some redirection of the budget (how about taking subsidies away from corn and putting them towards pharmaceutical research, for instance?) before we try for universal healthcare.

That sounds like a good plan, but it's ultimately up to which industry has the more effective lobby.
 

Hal9000

Forum Captain
405
3
18
The current plan is a horrendous mess of such epic proportions that it's nigh unimaginable. Emotional reasons based on the fact that many people do not have health insurance are illogical and prone to premature decisions.
 

rescue99

Forum Deputy Chief
1,073
0
0
I'm a Medic and I'm in Canton! I am also the mom of 3 (2 now) medically involved children and the wife of a 2x cancer survivor. We've sold a house for the purpose of using equity to pay off medical costs on at least 2 occasions. Our coverage is respectable but, our medical expenses are huge compared to the average household. Medical costs are just another bill we find a way to pay.

I wish to heaven illegals would learn the same concept! I am more than willing to help our own but, I do have issues with paying one red cent toward the care of anyone, man, woman or child, who lives here illegally. Even those who come here legally but are already too old or sick to work...let the families pay...just like we have to. May sound harsh but, oh well. I'ts time we took a special interest in what's best for our own citizens first.
 

46Young

Level 25 EMS Wizard
3,063
90
48
I'm a Medic and I'm in Canton! I am also the mom of 3 (2 now) medically involved children and the wife of a 2x cancer survivor. We've sold a house for the purpose of using equity to pay off medical costs on at least 2 occasions. Our coverage is respectable but, our medical expenses are huge compared to the average household. Medical costs are just another bill we find a way to pay.

I wish to heaven illegals would learn the same concept! I am more than willing to help our own but, I do have issues with paying one red cent toward the care of anyone, man, woman or child, who lives here illegally. Even those who come here legally but are already too old or sick to work...let the families pay...just like we have to. May sound harsh but, oh well. I'ts time we took a special interest in what's best for our own citizens first.

+1,000,000.

Sorry about your loss. no one should ever have to experience that.

I don't know the validity of this, but I've been told that you should never commit to a concrete payment plan with a hospital for medical bills, only to tell them that you don't know how much you can afford to pay towards the bill, only that you'll give something (be vague as to an actual dollar amount) each month. Give 5 bucks or something each month. It's almost like what the illegals do, which is not pay anything. consult an attorney, of course. No one should have to go broke over medical bills, especially when others are given the world.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

46Young

Level 25 EMS Wizard
3,063
90
48
The only plausible reason as to why illegals and the leeches of society are catered to is for increased chances of re-election. The illegals may have legal residents and sympathizers here, and they will have children, who will vote someday. The populations that would benefit from handouts and free rides (I'm entitled!) are legion. They'll elect politicians that serve their agendas. And so it goes on.......
 

Shishkabob

Forum Chief
8,264
32
48
Aren't you the one who was toting that people should get employed by employers that offer insurance if they could not afford it for themselves?

Yup. Where are you getting confused? If you want health insurance, go to a place that offers it, but don't force places to offer it.


So should we not be forced to have car insurance and not be fined when we don't?

You are ok with someone totaling your car, possibly injuring you and not having insurance?

First, car insurance isn't federally government mandated, and as such, is not applicable to this debate.

Second, not all states require auto insurance.

Thirdly, just as I believe with all types of insurance, you should have it, but if you opt not to (and it's legal to not have it), then it's your choice, and it's up to you to deal with the financial consequences of doing so. (And I'll reiterate: If it's legal)






Again: I'm all for people to have insurance, but it should not be federally government funded / mandated. On top of that, if you don't pay your share of taxes, you should not expect / get any share of government benefits. This is a topic that should be left up to the individual states to decide what they want to do.



Put the $1trillion towards education. I don't know why anyone would be against that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rescue99

Forum Deputy Chief
1,073
0
0
+1,000,000.

Sorry about your loss. no one should ever have to experience that.

I don't know the validity of this, but I've been told that you should never commit to a concrete payment plan with a hospital for medical bills, only to tell them that you don't know how much you can afford to pay towards the bill, only that you'll give something (be vague as to an actual dollar amount) each month. Give 5 bucks or something each month. It's almost like what the illegals do, which is not pay anything. consult an attorney, of course. No one should have to go broke over medical bills, especially when others are given the world.

You're correct. Hospital payment plans can be in bits and pieces. We work hard to get everything paid because it's the right thing to do. Nothing should come free to those who can pay. If I pay mine, the cost to everyone is lower. Medical costs go way, way beyond a hospital visit though. Those off lable meds for example, they're a killer! It's those additional costs that can add up and really squash a budget! Slows down being able to pay outstanding hospital bills as quickly as one would like. We've taken up to 4 years to pay some in full.

I for one am concerned with a national health care plan. Not for my kids because they can only be treated by specialists not available at corner hospitals. I'm more concerned for the average family who could wind up standing in line for years for routine medical care and procedures. I am concerned that budgets, politics and policies will leave hard working citizens in poor health due to delays in provider care. The list of concerns goes on.
 
Top