Fellow shooting enthusiasts:

My 2 Cents

I enjoy gun collecting, reloading, and shooting myself. I always carried a couple of the old style Combat Dressings in my shooting kit when I went to the range. When I get home from Afghanistan (contractor) I plan on replacing them with my Army Issue IFAK. Before deploying I received Combat Life Saver Training, and then attended an EMT-B course while in country, plan on testing for my NRENT-B on my next home leave or when I return home for good. Any care I would possible prove as a Good Samaritan, at home to a fellow shooter, would adhere to American Red Cross First Aid guide lines. Protocols taught during Combat Life Saver training fall well beyond even EMT-B protocols.
Cheers,
W-W
 
Always, I keep an IFAK right next to my cleaning supplies, courtesy of Uncle Sam. Be prepared for any situation, because you never know when your services might be needed. While I understand the whole, not stopping for every accident thing, but when we are shooting, the guys at the range are more like minded people. Many are EMS personnel, including out medical director.
 
One of the few reason I would like to live in the states for are the gun laws. I love shooting. Sporting shooters are treated like criminals in this country, by government and the community alike. :sad:

I shoot a .303 Short Mag Lee-Enfield and a '44 Nagant Carbine (my fav :wub: :wub:). I generally have a few extra dressings in the first aid kit that came with my car. Esp considering its a good 40 mins from hospital on a good day. I see absolutely no reason not too.
 
About 1.5 years ago a man shooting at a USPSA match at the range had a backfire on his limited gun, the barrel exploded filling his hands, face and neck with shrapnel. He was air transported and has recovered fully but after that incident they have a fully equipped jump bag on the premise, really when you're doing something like that its better safe than sorry.



My younger brother shooting for the heck of it:
http://www.youtube.com/user/rehaw3014#p/u/4/IgMvgvRMqqw
 
Wild_Weasel said:
I enjoy gun collecting, reloading, and shooting myself. I always carried a couple of the old style Combat Dressings in my shooting kit when I went to the range. When I get home from Afghanistan (contractor) I plan on replacing them with my Army Issue IFAK. Before deploying I received Combat Life Saver Training, and then attended an EMT-B course while in country, plan on testing for my NREMT-B on my next home leave or when I return home for good. Any care I would possible prove as a Good Samaritan, at home to a fellow shooter, would adhere to American Red Cross First Aid guide lines. Protocols taught during Combat Life Saver training fall well beyond even EMT-B protocols.
Cheers,
W-W
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say that CLS training goes beyond EMT. They're different. The purpose behind them makes them so. It's that the protocols used in CLS are designed for military/combat conditions. Years ago, when I was "just" an EMT, I probably could have easily been taught the CLS stuff. CLS is "just" a 40 hour course. I think of it as Combat Advanced First Aid.

Some skills, if performed in civilian life, would be considered outside the norm for EMT training.
 
Quick note about the Serpa debate ...

One of the biggest sniper comps I attend each year strictly forbids Serpas - we have a pistol scenario on every other stage either prior to, or after the long range engagement. I borrowed one and tried my Glock 22s and 23s with it and I personally couldn't see how a trained shooter could put one in his own leg with the Serpa. However, last three-gun one of the team leaders from Bragg (active duty Spec Ops) said they had three ADs the first month when the Serpas were introduced. Very surprising. I like Blade Tech DOH and SafaiLand 6325 anyway, or a plain snap-in kydex for comps.

My kit:

(1) 12"x12" abdomenal/stump pad
(10) 4" gauze pads
(10) 2" gauze pads
(10) Band-Aids, medium
(10) Band-Aids, small
(1) Bolin chest seal
(4 yds) 3" hemostatic packing gauze
(2) QwikClot sponges

(2 rolls) cling bandage, 3"
(2) cravats w/ safety pins
(1) self-adhesive compression wrap, 3.5"
(2) finger splints
(1 roll) 1" tape
(1 pk) Moleskin
(1) electronic thermometer
(1) holster w/ shears, scissors, hemostats, scalpel, and LED penlight
(1) CAT tourniquet
(1) CPR pocket mask
(4 pr) nitrile gloves
(1) stethoscope
(1) BP cuff
(1) NPA, 28F w/ lube
(1) disposable lighter
(1 sm roll) duct tape

(1 pk) sticky notes w/ pen
(1 sm) magnifying glass

(4 packets) hydrocortisone
(4 packets) alcohol prep
(4 packets) triple antibiotic ointment
(4 packets) burn ointment
(1 sm bottle) distilled water
(10) water purification tablets
(2 packets) Motrin
(2 packets) Benadryl
(2 packets) antidiarheal tablets
(2 packets) aspirin
 
For those who are unaware, us certified EMT types can pick up Glocks at LEO prices. I've been quoted $438 on the 17/22 and 19/23, and $518 on the G34/35 (my next purchase). S&W also provides LEO/FF pricing on their M&Ps, but I don't think they're 100% ready for prime time yet so I haven't checked the prices. I do love the feel of the M&P though. It's just hard to get away from the Glock trigger/reset, uber reliability, and quick 9mm conversion for competition.
 
Phlipper said:
For those who are unaware, us certified EMT types can pick up Glocks at LEO prices. I've been quoted $438 on the 17/22 and 19/23, and $518 on the G34/35 (my next purchase). S&W also provides LEO/FF pricing on their M&Ps, but I don't think they're 100% ready for prime time yet so I haven't checked the prices. I do love the feel of the M&P though. It's just hard to get away from the Glock trigger/reset, uber reliability, and quick 9mm conversion for competition.
Click to expand...

Sig Sauer allows first responders to pick up the LEO discount as well.
 
Damn... now I have to add a Sig to my list of weapons I want :p
And maybe S&W too, if single role EMS gets the FF/LEO discount too
 
HotelCo said:
Sig Sauer allows first responders to pick up the LEO discount as well.
Click to expand...
When I can afford it, I'll be getting a Sig. The discount makes it a little easier to afford. I'm thinking of a P220 in .45 ACP or a P229 in .40 S&W. Might be while though... but I can still dream...^_^
 
I think it's a great idea, I'm not a whacker but I really could care less if you call me one.;) I carry an IFAK for a lot of things that I do. That does not mean I'm going to treat everyone that scrapes their knee but hey,

I carry one for shooting, Diving, and most of the time while I'm on vacation because most of the time it's a foreign country or somewhere I'm not familiar with the workings/response of EMS in those areas.

Both of my trucks also have a fully stocked med bag. (rural area)
 
Let me first say that I'm only considering EMT training at this point, so I'm not part of the gang, persay, but being a gun nut/enthusiast, I thought I'd chime in...

Personally, I carry in a Blackhawk! Serpa level 2 retention holster, but I don't see how the holster would tend to cause AD's. If the rules for safe gun handling are being followed closely, I don't see how using a serpa would botch things up. As stated in this particular case, the guy's finger was on the trigger. But I digress....

Lastly, does no one else care for Springfield's XD series? I was torn between a Glock 23 and a XD40. I decided that the XD naturally fit my hand better and upon first picking it up, I found that it had excellent 'natural point of aim'/indexing.

Oh, one more thing... does anyone ever carry on the job? I thought it highly unlikely for any agency to authorize firearm carry on the job, but being a huge proponent of self defense, I think it a generally good idea. Thanks and take care, all.
 
hopnpop said:
Let me first say that I'm only considering EMT training at this point, so I'm not part of the gang, persay, but being a gun nut/enthusiast, I thought I'd chime in...

Personally, I carry in a Blackhawk! Serpa level 2 retention holster, but I don't see how the holster would tend to cause AD's. If the rules for safe gun handling are being followed closely, I don't see how using a serpa would botch things up. As stated in this particular case, the guy's finger was on the trigger. But I digress....

Lastly, does no one else care for Springfield's XD series? I was torn between a Glock 23 and a XD40. I decided that the XD naturally fit my hand better and upon first picking it up, I found that it had excellent 'natural point of aim'/indexing.

Oh, one more thing... does anyone ever carry on the job? I thought it highly unlikely for any agency to authorize firearm carry on the job, but being a huge proponent of self defense, I think it a generally good idea. Thanks and take care, all.
Click to expand...

Regarding the springfield xd, I don't care for it as a firearm, I found it unbalanced, clunky in my hand with an overly large grip compared to other similar firearms. It just felt all wrong in my hands. I also didn't like the way the model chambered in 40s&w shot, it tended to show some muzzle drop over multiple rounds down range. I felt the glock 22 was a superior firearm in almost every way, plus with the discount for homeland security the price was right on the glock
 
Bullets said:
Regarding the springfield xd, I don't care for it as a firearm, I found it unbalanced, clunky in my hand with an overly large grip compared to other similar firearms. It just felt all wrong in my hands. I also didn't like the way the model chambered in 40s&w shot, it tended to show some muzzle drop over multiple rounds down range. I felt the glock 22 was a superior firearm in almost every way, plus with the discount for homeland security the price was right on the glock
Click to expand...

That pretty much seems to be the differences in opinions on Glocks vs XDs. Those who side for the XD say similar things re: the Glocks and vice-versa. I find the shooting of the XD to be enjoyable and keeps pretty well on-target, but, diff'rent shooters, y'know. What's best for one isn't necessarily best for another. Thanks tho for the response. Carry on
 
hopnpop said:
Lastly, does no one else care for Springfield's XD series? I was torn between a Glock 23 and a XD40. I decided that the XD naturally fit my hand better and upon first picking it up, I found that it had excellent 'natural point of aim'/indexing.
Click to expand...

My boyfriend loves his XD40.

Bullets said:
Regarding the springfield xd, I don't care for it as a firearm, I found it unbalanced, clunky in my hand with an overly large grip compared to other similar firearms. It just felt all wrong in my hands.
Click to expand...

I agree with this part, however. I don't hate the XD, but it does feel overly large. I have small hands, though. Even glocks feel kinda big for me.

I'm probably gonna be looking at some kind of Kahr or Ruger when I get my own.
 
LucidResq said:
My boyfriend loves his XD40.



I agree with this part, however. I don't hate the XD, but it does feel overly large. I have small hands, though. Even glocks feel kinda big for me.

I'm probably gonna be looking at some kind of Kahr or Ruger when I get my own.
Click to expand...
As much as I hate to say this, try a 1911 format if you think the Glock is a big grip. It might work out for you, especially a single stack in .40 or 9mm.

I still say my next purchase will be a G29 for CCW, but the XD40 is an ok weapon in my opinion...
 
I've never heard anyone hating on the XD. Many of us (competition shooters) have Glocks, XDs, and M&Ps in our stable. My only issue with the XD is the high bore axis makes it flip a little harder in .40 cal, and for me it's a little more clunky feeling than a Glock and WAY more clunky feeling than the M&P. But the XD is a very reliable and accurate handgun. The M&P is by far the best feeling weapon, and I think most of the early issues have been sorted. If not for the odd trigger reset and lack of aftermarket support (relative to Glock) I'd a couple of them. I love the older Sigs, but on the newer ones I've tried the trigger pull is miles long so it won't work for me.

I like all reliable and accurate semi-auto pistols. A pistol is merely a tool, and besides, it's the Indian, not the arrow. Find what works for you and practice with an experienced shooter. You can't buy accuracy and tactical know-how no matter how much you spend.
 
jtpaintball70 said:
As much as I hate to say this, try a 1911 format if you think the Glock is a big grip. It might work out for you, especially a single stack in .40 or 9mm.

I still say my next purchase will be a G29 for CCW, but the XD40 is an ok weapon in my opinion...
Click to expand...

I'm also strongly considering a 1911 mainly because I've absolutely fallen in love with the Ruger Mark III 22/45. It was like a revelation the first time I shot it. So much more comfortable and accurate in my hands than all the XDs, Glocks, etc than I've played with in the past.
 
If XD's and Glocks feel too big, a 1911 is about right, try other single stack pistols too. If you can find a Sig P225 or a P6, S&W 3913 or pretty much any other single stack in 9mm or bigger, you might be pleasantly surprised. I thought the 3913 was a little small for my hand and because of that, the trigger guard would tend to rub my middle finger knuckle after a while...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top