terrible one
Always wandering
- 881
- 87
- 28
Some places do well with privates providing emergency EMS, but they are the minority
Some places do well with privates providing emergency EMS, but they are the minority
Some places do well with privates providing emergency EMS, but they are the minority
Interesting how they focused on R/M being investigated but failed to mention the ongoing investigation of Dallas FD over an alleged $40 million in Medicare fraud.
This has Harry Schaitberger written all over it.
If reimbursement rates drop, how is a private provider going to cut a profit, w/o contributions from the municipality? That defeats the purpose of outsourcing, doesn't it?
Personally I never want to see a system primarily run by private EMS. Private EMS companies are out to make money. Tri-med, a private EMS company in the PNW, has fired EMT's for requesting Paramedics. Why? Because the paramedics transport the patient who needed paramedic care and tri-med gets no money.
Where I live I like the fire based EMS system I have. Other places I would not want to see a firefighter even put a bandaid on someone. But I don't think EMS should be privatized. I feel it should be a municipality.
Care to cite your source?
I suppose I should have defined "do EMS well", essentially I meant the "well" from a prospective employee standpoint not the actual providing of care to communities.
If I could find a source that showed the pay, benefits, and retirements of municipal providers vs. those of a private nature I would post it. However, I find it very difficult to believe that the majority of private ambulances have higher salaries, etc. than there public counterparts. I know they do in certain areas but again those are not the majority.