wilderness911
paramedic student
- 59
- 26
- 18
I originally put this post together because one thing I have encountered in my work is a plethora of bad information regarding the best practices for management of various bites and stings, both in the field and in the clinic. So on to the subject of this post; an evidence-based debunking of the common misconceptions surrounding initial actions following a bee sting and a simple recommendation for the best strategies in removal of the stinger. As a wilderness medicine guy, I am often asked what to do in the event of a bee sting. To be clear, I am not addressing the clinical management of patients suffering from massive envenomations by dozens to hundreds of bees, which can result in coagulopathies and all sorts of other systemic effects. This post details the best practices for responding to a single bee sting (or a couple of stings) in the first minute or two following the event.
I originally wrote this up to answer a question from a woman who asked whether the sawyer venom extractor (an ineffective and potentially dangerous mechanical suction device marketed as the "only medically proven field treatment for snakebites and other envenomations") could provide any benefit for treating bee stings, which is of course one of the other things the sawyer company claims it does well. Without further adieu, the meat and potatoes of this argument.
Since I am not a bee guy by training, I did a pretty extensive search of the literature to make sure I wouldn't be misinforming anyone. The information I dug up in a few old journals was very interesting. Surprisingly few studies have been done on this subject, but I found a fantastically designed, peer-reviewed study looking at the kinetics of bee stings and venom injection "Rate and quantity of delivery of venom from honeybee stings." I will post the abstract and a link to the full text PDF at the bottom of this post so you all can come to your own conclusions, but here are the important pieces with respect to your question. This applies to honeybee species that leave the venom sac and stinger in the victim; wasps retain their stingers and can sting repeatedly. The study doesn't tell us much of anything about wasp stings, but the venom should be injected and distributed into the tissue much faster than a honeybee sting and there is no stinger left behind, so the sawyer would definitely not make sense to use on a wasp sting either.
Back to the honeybees...
What they consistently found in honeybees that leave the stinger and venom sac in the victim can be distilled down to a few key points.
1. When a bee sting occurs, the smooth muscle surrounding the venom sac immediately begins to contract. This causes the stinger to embed deeper into the victim's skin (about 2/3 of the way into the skin in the first 30 seconds). At the same time the venom sac is being squeezed like a turkey baster and injecting its contents deeper into the tissue due to the burrowing of the stinger.
2. All of this happens really fast. In the first 20 seconds after the stinger hits skin, 90% of the venom is injected into the victim and the stinger has burrowed deeper to facilitate injection into deeper tissues simultaneously. Even the slowest stingers in the group were done burrowing and injecting the vast majority of their venom by 30 seconds after the sting occurred.
3. Part of the study involved removal of the stingers at various times (5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 s, etc) after the sting occurred and then quantifying the differences in amount of venom injected over time. Not surprisingly, they found that the earlier a stinger was removed, the less venom was injected into the recipient...however, after 20 or 30 seconds the process of envenomation is basically over with so to make any real difference you need to get the stinger out in the first couple of seconds.
CONTINUES BELOW IN PART II
I originally wrote this up to answer a question from a woman who asked whether the sawyer venom extractor (an ineffective and potentially dangerous mechanical suction device marketed as the "only medically proven field treatment for snakebites and other envenomations") could provide any benefit for treating bee stings, which is of course one of the other things the sawyer company claims it does well. Without further adieu, the meat and potatoes of this argument.
Since I am not a bee guy by training, I did a pretty extensive search of the literature to make sure I wouldn't be misinforming anyone. The information I dug up in a few old journals was very interesting. Surprisingly few studies have been done on this subject, but I found a fantastically designed, peer-reviewed study looking at the kinetics of bee stings and venom injection "Rate and quantity of delivery of venom from honeybee stings." I will post the abstract and a link to the full text PDF at the bottom of this post so you all can come to your own conclusions, but here are the important pieces with respect to your question. This applies to honeybee species that leave the venom sac and stinger in the victim; wasps retain their stingers and can sting repeatedly. The study doesn't tell us much of anything about wasp stings, but the venom should be injected and distributed into the tissue much faster than a honeybee sting and there is no stinger left behind, so the sawyer would definitely not make sense to use on a wasp sting either.
Back to the honeybees...
What they consistently found in honeybees that leave the stinger and venom sac in the victim can be distilled down to a few key points.
1. When a bee sting occurs, the smooth muscle surrounding the venom sac immediately begins to contract. This causes the stinger to embed deeper into the victim's skin (about 2/3 of the way into the skin in the first 30 seconds). At the same time the venom sac is being squeezed like a turkey baster and injecting its contents deeper into the tissue due to the burrowing of the stinger.
2. All of this happens really fast. In the first 20 seconds after the stinger hits skin, 90% of the venom is injected into the victim and the stinger has burrowed deeper to facilitate injection into deeper tissues simultaneously. Even the slowest stingers in the group were done burrowing and injecting the vast majority of their venom by 30 seconds after the sting occurred.
3. Part of the study involved removal of the stingers at various times (5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 s, etc) after the sting occurred and then quantifying the differences in amount of venom injected over time. Not surprisingly, they found that the earlier a stinger was removed, the less venom was injected into the recipient...however, after 20 or 30 seconds the process of envenomation is basically over with so to make any real difference you need to get the stinger out in the first couple of seconds.
CONTINUES BELOW IN PART II