Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems to me these "good" medics are not necessarily the best clinicians.
I would hope that they are. I don't know what it would mean otherwise.
If I say someone is a good medic, I mean they're are a good clinician.
Does that mean they do not have to have any bedside manor? Do they always follow the rules or do they know when they can bend them in the best interest of the pt?
I can't count how many times I have heard this myself. "Oh he/she is a good medic." With the only reasoning to this statement is that "He/She has been doing this for 15 years." While I concede that more time doing a job generally means better mastery of the work, in medicine if you haven't picked up a book since you started 15 years ago you cannot possibly be a good medic.2, They know a lot of "tricks", are good with patients, but know little about medicine". What they really should be saying for number 2 is they're a good medic by a half.
The best medics I have seen have had all of these traits:
1) Good communication skills.
2) Adaptability to situations both medically and when communicating with others.
3) A strong and broad interest in medicine.
4) A good sense of humor.
Medics should be able to get along with most people they meet, they should also be interested enough to pick up a book and learn more about medicine on their own. Without these things I think one can be okay at being a medic but can never really be great at it. They end up either 1) Smart about medicine but either unable to talk to patients -or- impossible to get along with. 2) Completely ignorant about medicine but easy to get along with (I think these people tend to be liked more, and thus less likely to get $h*t canned for poor medical skills). Or 3) A complete moron who is also a douche or a smelly toolbag.
I can't count how many times I have heard this myself. "Oh he/she is a good medic." With the only reasoning to this statement is that "He/She has been doing this for 15 years." While I concede that more time doing a job generally means better mastery of the work, in medicine if you haven't picked up a book since you started 15 years ago you cannot possibly be a good medic.
The best medics I have seen have had all of these traits:
1) Good communication skills.
2) Adaptability to situations both medically and when communicating with others.
3) A strong and broad interest in medicine.
4) A good sense of humor.
Medics should be able to get along with most people they meet, they should also be interested enough to pick up a book and learn more about medicine on their own. Without these things I think one can be okay at being a medic but can never really be great at it. They end up either 1) Smart about medicine but either unable to talk to patients -or- impossible to get along with. 2) Completely ignorant about medicine but easy to get along with (I think these people tend to be liked more, and thus less likely to get $h*t canned for poor medical skills). Or 3) A complete moron who is also a douche or a smelly toolbag.
A good paramedic should:
Be competent in all their required skills
Be a good teacher
Be able to communicate with people from all walks of life
A good problem solver
Continue their education
I've always heard that a medic is only as good as his/her partner helps him be. In other words if a medic has a good partner then he/she will be fine, but if the partner sucks then it has a tendency to reflect on the medic. That is just what I have been told by others in EMS.
That sounds ridiculous. I've had good partners, bad partners and horrible partners; my partner has no effect on how I provide patient care.
If they didn't, ambulance would not be crewed by two people.
I've always heard that a medic is only as good as his/her partner helps him be. In other words if a medic has a good partner then he/she will be fine, but if the partner sucks then it has a tendency to reflect on the medic. That is just what I have been told by others in EMS.
I disagree. My partner plays no role in the care I provide, unless he is crappy driver. That is about the only way my partner can affect me and the implications will be felt by the patient. An annoying partner might make me crabby, but I am aware of that and take steps to ensure that I don't take it out on my patient. I imagine this is doubly true in P/B type system.
To add to some of the above posts...the importance of a quality and continuing education cannot be overstated. A "good medic" furthers his education in the professional sense but is also a able to listen to the suggestions of other providers. One doesn't have to implement any suggestions, but being a good listener is key. The opposite is true, a "good medic" is able to provide suggestions, lessons, and insight to his fellow providers in a constructive manner.
Case in point: we were taking patient from ECF to ED at night, dark out hard to see from the back. Pt was having an MI. ECF to Hospital was 25 miles. We got to the hospital, with a very smooth calm ride; went to unload the patient and I realized that we were are the wrong hospital, we went about 28 miles the WRONG direction. Hospital didn't have cardiac Cath capability even during the day, much less at night. Patient did survive, but that ED had to evaluate patient, make the decision to ship him.