WuLabsWuTecH
Forum Deputy Chief
- 1,244
- 7
- 38
So here is my question:
Shopping for helicopters in regards to weather can be very dangerous, and is unethical. At least in our area, it's frown upon as sometimes it can be seen as trying to urge others to take unnecessary risks. I know that some areas now have a policy of agreeing together, when to shut down, and unless they specifically tell you, we can't approach from the south, you may want to try LifeFlight ABC who can approach from the north, calling other companies will just get you the same result. This I understand.
Here's the new issue we are running into:
Companies are increasingly telling us that we should not shop around for the best response time. That is, since there are 4 companies that cover our (massive, 190 square mile) run district, we should not get alternate quotes for times after we already contact one company. Here's the issue we run into: (we will call the 4 companies North, South, East, and West for simplicity) we roll to an MVA north of the station and we call North Air because they are usually the closest. Unfortunately all of their close units are out, and their usual 15 minute ETA is now a 30 minute ETA. Still better than ground-pounding them to the nearest trauma center, but not by much. Usually, what we then do is have dispatch call West air and East air and get us quotes for them, knowing that they will probably have an ETA of around 20 minutes. We're being told this is bad. The companies are claiming that we should not do this shopping "costs too much time" and patient condition can deteriorate during the time you are shopping. I contend that while that may be true if you are in a more urban area or closer to an urban center, when you are 35 minutes away from the outskirts of the nearest city, the extra 5 minutes you call might be worth it to save another 5-10 minutes, or even more.
What our chief is doing now is taking our run cards (which are managed by each station, not by the dispatchers, so we are dispatched as "Station 100, respond to an MVA at highway 1, MM 100" and we the have to figure out what apparatus are going and who is going with us--dumb I know but that's another argument.) which splits our district into 8 sections and is how we determine the closest engines and rescues (our 1 medic run district encompasses 8 fire run districts) and is adding the helicopters to the run cards. So if we respond to a certain address, for an MVC, we pull that run card to see that, for example, we need South fire department's rescue, West fire department's engine, and our first due medic (on the off chance we have 2 staffed), but now we also see a list of helicopters like this:
West Air 1: 10 minutes
South Air 1: 12 minutes
West Air 2: 13 minutes
West Air 3: 15 minutes
South Air 2: 16 minutes
East Air: 20 minutes
And based on that, we request West Air. If their "first due" bird is out, we're supposed to just request their second bird and not request south air's first due--at least that's what one of the companies is strongly pushing.
The new question then becomes, what if we pull the run card and it looks like this:
North Air 1: 10 minutes
West Air 1: 12 minutes
West Air 2: 13 minutes
West Air 3: 15 minutes
West Air 4: 16 minutes
North Air 2: 25 minutes
Since we are only "allowed" to make one call, to make that one call count, should we hedge our bets and on the run card have West Air as the person we call? (Eventually once this all gets straightened out, the Chief will just have a company listed on the run card so we don't have to make these decisions in the field. It will just say on the run card:
Helicopter Assignment:
1st due: West Air
If all units out:
2nd Due: North Air
I'm curious if anyone else is running into these issues being pushed elsewhere in the country. It's interesting because while all 5 or 6 companies we are working with have mentioned this, one in particular is pushing it hard and we are wondering if it is a business decision for them as they are in that second scenario that I described where they are the closest unit but their second due is a long, long ways away.
We have helicopter representatives it seems at the station every week trying to help us devise our new run cards (perk: lots of free gear) but I feel that I've never heard of this "shopping argument" either because it's relatively new, or with the opening of a new company in the area (West Air in the second scenario described above) North air feels they are going to lose some major business from us. I'd be interested to see what their response is to our chief telling them are are second due because if we can only make one call, we're going to hedge our bets with West Air...
Thoughts and opinions?
Shopping for helicopters in regards to weather can be very dangerous, and is unethical. At least in our area, it's frown upon as sometimes it can be seen as trying to urge others to take unnecessary risks. I know that some areas now have a policy of agreeing together, when to shut down, and unless they specifically tell you, we can't approach from the south, you may want to try LifeFlight ABC who can approach from the north, calling other companies will just get you the same result. This I understand.
Here's the new issue we are running into:
Companies are increasingly telling us that we should not shop around for the best response time. That is, since there are 4 companies that cover our (massive, 190 square mile) run district, we should not get alternate quotes for times after we already contact one company. Here's the issue we run into: (we will call the 4 companies North, South, East, and West for simplicity) we roll to an MVA north of the station and we call North Air because they are usually the closest. Unfortunately all of their close units are out, and their usual 15 minute ETA is now a 30 minute ETA. Still better than ground-pounding them to the nearest trauma center, but not by much. Usually, what we then do is have dispatch call West air and East air and get us quotes for them, knowing that they will probably have an ETA of around 20 minutes. We're being told this is bad. The companies are claiming that we should not do this shopping "costs too much time" and patient condition can deteriorate during the time you are shopping. I contend that while that may be true if you are in a more urban area or closer to an urban center, when you are 35 minutes away from the outskirts of the nearest city, the extra 5 minutes you call might be worth it to save another 5-10 minutes, or even more.
What our chief is doing now is taking our run cards (which are managed by each station, not by the dispatchers, so we are dispatched as "Station 100, respond to an MVA at highway 1, MM 100" and we the have to figure out what apparatus are going and who is going with us--dumb I know but that's another argument.) which splits our district into 8 sections and is how we determine the closest engines and rescues (our 1 medic run district encompasses 8 fire run districts) and is adding the helicopters to the run cards. So if we respond to a certain address, for an MVC, we pull that run card to see that, for example, we need South fire department's rescue, West fire department's engine, and our first due medic (on the off chance we have 2 staffed), but now we also see a list of helicopters like this:
West Air 1: 10 minutes
South Air 1: 12 minutes
West Air 2: 13 minutes
West Air 3: 15 minutes
South Air 2: 16 minutes
East Air: 20 minutes
And based on that, we request West Air. If their "first due" bird is out, we're supposed to just request their second bird and not request south air's first due--at least that's what one of the companies is strongly pushing.
The new question then becomes, what if we pull the run card and it looks like this:
North Air 1: 10 minutes
West Air 1: 12 minutes
West Air 2: 13 minutes
West Air 3: 15 minutes
West Air 4: 16 minutes
North Air 2: 25 minutes
Since we are only "allowed" to make one call, to make that one call count, should we hedge our bets and on the run card have West Air as the person we call? (Eventually once this all gets straightened out, the Chief will just have a company listed on the run card so we don't have to make these decisions in the field. It will just say on the run card:
Helicopter Assignment:
1st due: West Air
If all units out:
2nd Due: North Air
I'm curious if anyone else is running into these issues being pushed elsewhere in the country. It's interesting because while all 5 or 6 companies we are working with have mentioned this, one in particular is pushing it hard and we are wondering if it is a business decision for them as they are in that second scenario that I described where they are the closest unit but their second due is a long, long ways away.
We have helicopter representatives it seems at the station every week trying to help us devise our new run cards (perk: lots of free gear) but I feel that I've never heard of this "shopping argument" either because it's relatively new, or with the opening of a new company in the area (West Air in the second scenario described above) North air feels they are going to lose some major business from us. I'd be interested to see what their response is to our chief telling them are are second due because if we can only make one call, we're going to hedge our bets with West Air...
Thoughts and opinions?