mycrofft
Still crazy but elsewhere
- 11,322
- 48
- 48
Thank you USAF and ECMODoc
USAF: caught me. Pesky except to the owner-operator how all those giblets are fastened so they don't just tumble around, usually.
ECMODoc, I get your point. Hard to isolate causes for what might or might not be delayed sequelae, especially when your control group (no bypass machine) would be around 100% dead. After the enlightenment regarding Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery M&M reporting (initial researchers were stakeholders, and the 18 month f/u was cherry picked), I think each and every new procedure higher than topical wart removal ought to be retrospectively checked for efficacy, AND for whether or not in real life it is being taught, learned, and done safely and effectively.
The whole prehospital ECMO sounds like good fodder for Stephen King , but then so would have field cardioversion many years ago.
USAF: caught me. Pesky except to the owner-operator how all those giblets are fastened so they don't just tumble around, usually.
ECMODoc, I get your point. Hard to isolate causes for what might or might not be delayed sequelae, especially when your control group (no bypass machine) would be around 100% dead. After the enlightenment regarding Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery M&M reporting (initial researchers were stakeholders, and the 18 month f/u was cherry picked), I think each and every new procedure higher than topical wart removal ought to be retrospectively checked for efficacy, AND for whether or not in real life it is being taught, learned, and done safely and effectively.
The whole prehospital ECMO sounds like good fodder for Stephen King , but then so would have field cardioversion many years ago.
Last edited by a moderator: