From the class I took they gave me a review NREMT manual...but now that I just looked at it it was dated in 2005 (and I took the class last february, go figure)
and I've just been an idiot and lagged on taking the test, but The NREMT is just what gets me, I hate how they word everything, whenever I did practicals I did them perfectly.
Okay, most people are trying to assume that they understand educational philosophies and methodologies.
Skills in educational system are considered as repetitive. In other words, with enough practice anyone should and get it right. Sorry, basic skills when compared to other areas are really a no brainier. Cognitive knowledge however is another point.
Board examinations are based upon professional standards. One cannot just ask simplistic questions such as most are used to in school as being black and white. Again, I fault most instructors of not fully preparing their student for board/certfication examinations. Most do not an formal or any education other than a simple EMT Instructor course in adult education and defintely not in test writing. Yet, we expect students of those instructors to do well in those type of tests.
Again, don't blame the tests... they have been written in the same format for over 30 years. This is nothing new, nor different than any other credible or professional test.
So the blame has to be placed upon either the educational system you attended for not adequately preparing you or one not personally studying correctly.
How many schools have test per computer based, or written in the same format as the NREMT? Did your instructor allow time for review for certification? Was there classes offered to improve test scores?
This is why I refer back to anyone consider moving upward or even taking a Basic NREMT course, look at the percentage of passing per NREMT or license boards. Even if they can produce the best skilled tech., it will not matter if you cannot pass the boards.
R/r 911