- 5,610
- 477
- 83
What controversial opinion(s) do you have about EMS?
I'll go first: those that refuse to be vaccinated shouldn't be in EMS.
I'll go first: those that refuse to be vaccinated shouldn't be in EMS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Private EMS (including IFT) should not exist. Putting profit over people is wrong.
Don’t care about EMS? Do you honestly care about where every single cent of your tax money goes?What’s your alternative when taxpayers don’t care?
Do you honestly care about where every single cent of your tax money goes?
This is pretty much how it’s done for hospital to hospital transfers. Hospital A contacts Hospital B and gets acceptance. Doctor at Hospital A decides HEMS will be the best option.HEMS should require hospital based medical control approval prior to all call departures.
Yeah, so if the receiving hospital makes a determination like that for an interfacility transfer, it would make sense if they did it for patients in the field as well.This is pretty much how it’s done for hospital to hospital transfers. Hospital A contacts Hospital B and gets acceptance. Doctor at Hospital A decides HEMS will be the best option.
So you want a ground EMS unit to call the hospital and get the on from med control at the hospital to fly a patient? Instead of the ground EMS crew making that determination on their own?Yeah, so if the receiving hospital makes a determination like that for an interfacility transfer, it would make sense if they did it for patients in the field as well.
Or the flight crew themselves...for anything that would not be determined to be a reasonable lights and siren return by ground in any other circumstance. Just 'cause the helicopter shows up doesn't mean they have to take someone, which, I know you know. But that isn't always how it plays out.So you want a ground EMS unit to call the hospital and get the on from med control at the hospital to fly a patient? Instead of the ground EMS crew making that determination on their own?
Oh I would absolutely love to land and then say “we can’t justify flying this one” and then leaving. I don’t ever see that happening unfortunatelyOr the flight crew themselves...for anything that would not be determined to be a reasonable lights and siren return by ground in any other circumstance. Just 'cause the helicopter shows up doesn't mean they have to take someone, which, I know you know. But that isn't always how it plays out.
This is the controversy thread, remember...
Thus putting it on medical control at the receiving hospital.Oh I would absolutely love to land and then say “we can’t justify flying this one” and then leaving. I don’t ever see that happening unfortunately
The helicopters here will do that regularly. Volunteer BLS first response requests a helicopter on dispatch. Helicopter arrives, provides an assessment, and if warranted, waits until the ALS ambulance shows up and gives a handoff and flies away.Oh I would absolutely love to land and then say “we can’t justify flying this one” and then leaving. I don’t ever see that happening unfortunately
I care about EMS, but the optics often will be "you're raising my taxes for what?!" in many places. That said, most of the public does agree that taxes should fund EMS (see pg. 2 of Carson & Shepperd, 2020)Don’t care about EMS? Do you honestly care about where every single cent of your tax money goes?
I love this. It is indeed a totally backwards model. This is where fly car medics come in! That said, I do enjoy a good critical BLS call...The current tiered system is totally backwards. Sending someone with apx 120 hours of training to see if someone needs an actual assessment from a provider with formal education is backwards. You don’t know what you don’t know.