EMT-B administering IV's?

Don't worry, Medicus. We gave him the chair!
 
Don't worry, Medicus. We gave him the chair!

I knew I would eventually win the chair. Now as Chairman of emtlife my first action is........
 
Is there a logical reason to allowing an emt to start an iv? I have worked as an emt for close to fifteen years and never once have I thought I wish I could put an iv in this patient.

In my experience a patient that requires an iv is probably going to require a paramedic at some point.

Please save all your comments about every patient needing a paramedic it simply isn't true, the toe pain with the underlying inferior wall MI going on is getting a little old.

Maybe in a PB system.

Other then that I really don't see the point, I agree it would be up to your medical director.

Really six weeks, wow.

Good luck.
 
Is there a logical reason to allowing an emt to start an iv? I have worked as an emt for close to fifteen years and never once have I thought I wish I could put an iv in this patient.

Depends on the environment.

Wilderness, disaster, long transport/evac times, etc.

15 or less minutes to the hospital, no real reason.
 
Is there a logical reason to allowing an emt to start an iv? I have worked as an emt for close to fifteen years and never once have I thought I wish I could put an iv in this patient.

In my experience a patient that requires an iv is probably going to require a paramedic at some point.

And a doctor probably.
 
Is there a logical reason to allowing an emt to start an iv? I have worked as an emt for close to fifteen years and never once have I thought I wish I could put an iv in this patient.

In my experience a patient that requires an iv is probably going to require a paramedic at some point.

I can particularly see its value from more of a support standpoint. Lets say you have a code, the EMT with the ability to start an IV can do so, freeing the medic up to do the higher level tasks such as analyzing the situation and deciding on an appropriate course of action. When he has done so, the IV is in place and good to go.

If it is a simple case of hypovolemic shock, the EMT can begin fluid resuscitation independently.

-Medicus
 
Number one I showed no hostility to the OP so drop that crap.

Actually under the new levels no Paramedics are not emts they are Paramedics.

Medicus is the maker of a darn good golf club. Or by definition can be as high as a doctor or just be a hospital orderly. In your case your remarks are leading me to come up with another definition but I will leave that alone.

Medicus is Latin for physician. I took five years of it. Vesalius, for example, was a medicus.

Glad to know they changed the word play for NREMT-P, that really changes what it is.

Your comments are indicative of a well-developed inferiority complex. You feel threatened by the OP and felt the need to comment because you know they could have the same license in nine months to a year.
 
Vene: I don't have any experience with wilderness ems, I saw a tree the other day it was nice, we should get more of those.

Bstone: My point was an ALS complaint will usually get an ALS response here.

Medicus: I agree in some areas which work PB this could be valuable, here when Als arrives it will be two medics. The emts will then concentrate on effective compressions while the medics address medications, monitoring and airway.
 
Vene: I don't have any experience with wilderness ems, I saw a tree the other day it was nice, we should get more of those.

Bstone: My point was an ALS complaint will usually get an ALS response here.

Medicus: I agree in some areas which work PB this could be valuable, here when Als arrives it will be two medics. The emts will then concentrate on effective compressions while the medics address medications, monitoring and airway.

Always depends on the environment. I didn't know what PB stood for (I assumed it meant pay-based). From an operations standpoint, it makes more sense to me to have one medic on an ambulance and one basic so you could run two ALS units instead of just a BLS and ALS.
 
Your comments are indicative of a well-developed inferiority complex. You feel threatened by the OP and felt the need to comment because you know they could have the same license in nine months to a year.

Pull your head out of your butt, wipe the excrement off the glasses, and read my post. I never downgraded or attacked the OP. And again I have already stated that Paramedics don't have enough education. I hope the OP goes forth and gets more education. I feel no threat from the OP.

Why do you feel threatened by me? You are actually trying to do what you falsely accuse me of doing so thus you feel threatened by me based on your own comments.
 
If it is a simple case of hypovolemic shock, the EMT can begin fluid resuscitation independently.

-Medicus
Would you trust the ER tech or CNA with determining that a patient is in hypovolemic shock and initiating fluids?
 
with the training that I have received, i think it would be irresponsible to me or other basics to start IVs... theres no physiology involved in the emt-b curriculum that would carry over the IV's
 
Would you trust the ER tech or CNA with determining that a patient is in hypovolemic shock and initiating fluids?

It's hard to believe that they allow Paramedics with their limited education to do it. Many Paramedics can not explain the whats and whys.
 
Would you trust the ER tech or CNA with determining that a patient is in hypovolemic shock and initiating fluids?

:blink: What a terrifying thought! That post really did startle me.

I guess the reason, I am not against EMTs starting IVs is that I forget everyone else doesn't really have the same working knowledge.

I'm still cringing from your post. I'm going to have nightmares tonight. Thanks a lot.
 
:blink: What a terrifying thought! That post really did startle me.

I guess the reason, I am not against EMTs starting IVs is that I forget everyone else doesn't really have the same working knowledge.

I'm still cringing from your post. I'm going to have nightmares tonight. Thanks a lot.

If it makes you feel any better, in the 70s and early 80s prior to nursing moving into the EDs, the ED techs, who had less formal education and a lot of OTJ often started lines and fluids.
 
Would you trust the ER tech or CNA with determining that a patient is in hypovolemic shock and initiating fluids?

Eh, depends.


Cook Childrens hires ONLY Paramedics as ER techs.


So yes, I would trust some ER techs with that.
 
Eh, depends.


Cook Childrens hires ONLY Paramedics as ER techs.


So yes, I would trust some ER techs with that.

...and what about the majority of other places that either uses CNAs and/or EMTs for techs? :D
 
...and what about the majority of other places that either uses CNAs and/or EMTs for techs? :D

Ah, but you said ER techs, you didn't qualify it was a cert level, and as such was a null and void blanket statement :P




But, just to indulge...


I don't know.. should I trust you?
 
Ah, but you said ER techs, you didn't qualify it was a cert level, and as such was a null and void blanket statement :P




But, just to indulge...


I don't know.. should I trust you?

Touche at this point...
 
I just put their hand in a water bowl, and rehydrate themselves by absorbtioin. unless they p on the cot first, then plan B.
 
Back
Top