ATLS Audit

Fox800

Forum Captain
397
0
16
I'm considering applying for some flight jobs in the near future. Have any of you guys audited an ATLS course? I notice that a lot of air medical agencies require their paramedics to audit it before applying or shortly after being hired.
 

DrankTheKoolaid

Forum Deputy Chief
1,344
21
38
Anything has to be better then taking ITLS or PHTLS again...
 

Veneficus

Forum Chief
7,301
16
0
It is a decent class, easily summed up with: transfer to a higher level of care.

Lectures are usually good and the book has useful info.
 

TheGodfather

Forum Lieutenant
165
0
0
I've taken it.... very good class (if you read the book cover-to-cover).

Class gets a little above the standard paramedics scope of practice, but it was very interesting doing chest tubes and performing DPLs.. the class definitely was a game changer for me in my practice.. I'd recommend it.
 

Veneficus

Forum Chief
7,301
16
0
I've taken it.... very good class (if you read the book cover-to-cover).

Class gets a little above the standard paramedics scope of practice, but it was very interesting doing chest tubes and performing DPLs.. the class definitely was a game changer for me in my practice.. I'd recommend it.

You know the name of the class is actually "ATLS for doctors"? :)
 

usalsfyre

You have my stapler
4,319
108
63
I'm told TNATC is a better choice for non-physicians looking for an advanced trauma class.
 

AirMed44

Forum Probie
11
0
0
I've taken both. In my opinion, TNATC is a much better course for transport personnel. It's fantastic! And if you are looking to get a hand up on a flight job, I think they might take more notice of TNATC. Good luck!
 

Veneficus

Forum Chief
7,301
16
0
I'm told TNATC is a better choice for non-physicians looking for an advanced trauma class.

I am not at all surprised by this.

The purpose of ATLS is not to definitively treat trauma, it is to do some basic (for physicians) treatments in order to hopefully figure out it is too serious to handle and send it on to the experts.

The 3 times I have sat in ATLS the instructor (a surgical intensivist of great reknown) started the class with the speech "We are not here to teach you how to be experts in trauma."

But in my opinion, ATLS is definately worth the time for medics. Especially if you are permitted to practice surgical skills. (I know not all programs permit this because of the cost of surgical simulations)

Even without the class, you could learn a substantial amount from reading the book.
 

TheGodfather

Forum Lieutenant
165
0
0
I am not at all surprised by this.

The purpose of ATLS is not to definitively treat trauma, it is to do some basic (for physicians) treatments in order to hopefully figure out it is too serious to handle and send it on to the experts.

The 3 times I have sat in ATLS the instructor (a surgical intensivist of great reknown) started the class with the speech "We are not here to teach you how to be experts in trauma."

But in my opinion, ATLS is definately worth the time for medics. Especially if you are permitted to practice surgical skills. (I know not all programs permit this because of the cost of surgical simulations)

Even without the class, you could learn a substantial amount from reading the book.

^^I could not agree more! I was told the same line from my instructor.

The class (IMO) gets you in the right mindset to handle multiple trauma incidents in a linear, organized, non-chaotic fashion... They really hammer the ABCDE's of trauma assessment/treatment and keep you from getting overwhelmed and/or tunnel visioned with the "obvious" musculoskeletal injuries that may distract you from the big picture.

With that said, the class is basically the "big-brother" class of PHTLS, so you might benefit more by reading the ATLS book and using those core concepts in a PHTLS class (since both courses basically cover the same principles)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top