This came up in a recent thread and, even if it has been discussed before, it's probably time it was again.
There is lot's of talk, both here and in real life about how such-and-such an agency is "good" or "one of the best" and how others are "bad." Being able to see what makes an agency "bad" or "good" on the surface is relatively easy, but more should go into it than that But there are lot's of different departments that are continually referenced as "the best."
Why? What is it that makes some of these places get that reputation, desirvedly or not? If "one of the best" agencies has a massive yearly turnover, are they really the best? If they have a great PR machine is that what does it? Is it their history in the community? What is it?
What really should be thought about before labeling a group "one of the best EMS agencies in the US," and what are people actually thinking about?
Is it the money and job titles?
Base salary?
Benefits?
Retirement?
Wage increases?
Promotional ladder?
Number and type of non-line paramedic jobs?
Is it what the paramedics can do?
Calls run per shift? Per year?
Procedures performed? Number performed successfully? Initially successfully? Appropriately?
Procedures available?
Medications available?
Medications rountinely given? Given appropriately?
How accurate are the field diagnosis?
Amount of trauma/stroke/STEMI activations?
Amount of accurate trauma/stroke/STEMi activations?
Number of intubations per paramedic per year?
The number of appropriate and initially successful intubations?
Ability to RSI? Do it correctly?
Autonomous care or calling for everything? Calling for some things?
Refuse care/transport?
How much of their own discretion can they use?
Is it the working conditions?
Fixed vs dynamic posts?
Lots of down time?
Good equipment?
Defined disciplinary steps?
Having a current contract?
Appropriately promoted supervisors?
Mangament who will stand with you?
Are people who need to be fired/disciplined fired or disciplined?
Is there a remediation process?
Do people stay for their career, or routinely leave?
Is it the medical director?
How involved is he/she?
How much authority do they have?
How can/do they change how things are done?
Will they stand up for their paramedics when appropriate?
Do they have QA/QI setup for all thier paramedics?
Is it the system?
Is it because they aren't fire-based?
Do they have a PR setup and PIO? Do they use them?
Do they overuse their PR setup?
Is it how other local agencies feel about them?
Is it how area hosptials feel about them/interact with them?
Number of medical studies they contribute to? Perform?
Is the the cardiac arrest save rate? Overall or Utstein?
Is it being a tiered system or taking everything?
If it is tiered, how set are those rules?
Do other services duplicate what they do?
Dose the system track what they do and make decisions using that data?
Is it that they are trying new things? Or only doing what is tried and true?
Is it how people are hired?
Is there an involed testing process that looks at paramedic-level knowledge? Knowledge above that?
Is it having an initial training period?
An FTO period? The length of it? What is done during it?
Is the the number of applicants?
Are any of these what people think about when deciding to label an agency "one of the best" or "a top system?" Should any of these be considered? Do people just look for buzzwords and what others are saying now, or actually think about it for themselves?
There is lot's of talk, both here and in real life about how such-and-such an agency is "good" or "one of the best" and how others are "bad." Being able to see what makes an agency "bad" or "good" on the surface is relatively easy, but more should go into it than that But there are lot's of different departments that are continually referenced as "the best."
Why? What is it that makes some of these places get that reputation, desirvedly or not? If "one of the best" agencies has a massive yearly turnover, are they really the best? If they have a great PR machine is that what does it? Is it their history in the community? What is it?
What really should be thought about before labeling a group "one of the best EMS agencies in the US," and what are people actually thinking about?
Is it the money and job titles?
Base salary?
Benefits?
Retirement?
Wage increases?
Promotional ladder?
Number and type of non-line paramedic jobs?
Is it what the paramedics can do?
Calls run per shift? Per year?
Procedures performed? Number performed successfully? Initially successfully? Appropriately?
Procedures available?
Medications available?
Medications rountinely given? Given appropriately?
How accurate are the field diagnosis?
Amount of trauma/stroke/STEMI activations?
Amount of accurate trauma/stroke/STEMi activations?
Number of intubations per paramedic per year?
The number of appropriate and initially successful intubations?
Ability to RSI? Do it correctly?
Autonomous care or calling for everything? Calling for some things?
Refuse care/transport?
How much of their own discretion can they use?
Is it the working conditions?
Fixed vs dynamic posts?
Lots of down time?
Good equipment?
Defined disciplinary steps?
Having a current contract?
Appropriately promoted supervisors?
Mangament who will stand with you?
Are people who need to be fired/disciplined fired or disciplined?
Is there a remediation process?
Do people stay for their career, or routinely leave?
Is it the medical director?
How involved is he/she?
How much authority do they have?
How can/do they change how things are done?
Will they stand up for their paramedics when appropriate?
Do they have QA/QI setup for all thier paramedics?
Is it the system?
Is it because they aren't fire-based?
Do they have a PR setup and PIO? Do they use them?
Do they overuse their PR setup?
Is it how other local agencies feel about them?
Is it how area hosptials feel about them/interact with them?
Number of medical studies they contribute to? Perform?
Is the the cardiac arrest save rate? Overall or Utstein?
Is it being a tiered system or taking everything?
If it is tiered, how set are those rules?
Do other services duplicate what they do?
Dose the system track what they do and make decisions using that data?
Is it that they are trying new things? Or only doing what is tried and true?
Is it how people are hired?
Is there an involed testing process that looks at paramedic-level knowledge? Knowledge above that?
Is it having an initial training period?
An FTO period? The length of it? What is done during it?
Is the the number of applicants?
Are any of these what people think about when deciding to label an agency "one of the best" or "a top system?" Should any of these be considered? Do people just look for buzzwords and what others are saying now, or actually think about it for themselves?